Onwards to My Next Exam

June 6th, 2011

Well I didn’t pass Schematic Design. Got moderate deficiencies on the building layout vignette.

I’m not exactly sure what I did wrong, which is disappointing. I have to guess at my errors. I think it was too many L-shaped and skinny rooms. It probably came down to room porportion. There may have been other things too. I had an overhang over the entry. Maybe it was too deep. I also had a visual control solution that may not have been as acceptable as I considered. But I really think it was all because of too many L-shaped and skinny rooms. Damn.

I’m disappointed because the interior layout was managable in the time allotted. Next time who knows what I may get!

At least this mishap will encourage more practice on my part. I had lost a bit of heart and had admitted to ‘throwing money’ at a previous exam. Well it wasn’t money alone that did it. In addition it was throwing some practice, time and effort. I’ll have to step up my efforts next time with more consistent practice. Onwards to conquer the architectural registration exam!

The Fatal Error

May 18th, 2011

I left Schematic Design feeling cool and ok. I thought everything I did on that architectural registration exam was ok. I wasn’t leaving thinking it was perfect, just ok. No fatal errors anywhere as far as I could tell.

And that’s just it. “As far as I could tell.” Finished, I think back and say I really hope I didn’t have a fatal error.

Exit doors swung in the exit direction. No dead end corridors. Six foot clear corridor distance. Had the 60″ diameter circle in every room. 36″ clearance to all pieces of furniture, except some coffee tables placed in corners. Correct door clearances at both door sides of all doors. I mean those were the fatal errors that popped into my head.

Could I have missed something? Maybe. And that’s just a part of the after-exam-guessing torture some of us put ourselves through. Good luck on your exams!

Maybe Third Time’s the Charm

May 16th, 2011

…then again maybe not. I took the Schematic Design architectural registration exam on Sunday. I think I got everything right.

One problem was the ratio of some of the room sizes. I didn’t realize it until towards the end of the exam. My understanding (from maybe the AREforum) is that rooms should be somewhere close to a 2:1 ratio for room sizes. So a 200 square foot room should be close to 10 feet by 20 feet.

This is an example and I didn’t have any rooms exactly this size. Let’s say a room is 25 feet by 8 feet, which is 200 square feet but has a 3.125:1 ratio. That might be ok, but it’s my understanding closer to the 2:1 ratio is better. I think it also depends on how may rooms have an exaggerated ratio. One or two is not as bad as five or six.

I modified everything to as close to a 2:1 ratio as I could with time remaining. I was too committed to risk the amount of shifting it required to really feel comfortable. There was a good few feet of space I could have shifted my plan to make room to widen some skinny rooms. Matter fact that’s an easier way of saying it. Some rooms were too skinny. That’s how I noticed them in my head, while reviewing the plan. “Aren’t those rooms kind of skinny?”, I thought.

I think I made all the necessary corrections and have a passing result. I’ll let you know. Good luck on your exams!